What we Have Learned So Far?

Thus far, English Comp. 1020 has taught me how open up my writing to a much more broader and essential tone. My choice of “Games and Society” was an experimental decision and I must say that arguing back and forth about games and the Internet’s risky ways has really brought on a challenge. In the beginning, we started off we an analysis based on reading different articles/books of our choice and then debate, but at the same time analyze or prove the point on why the particular topic of debate stands out so well. During that type of analysis we were asked to optionally follow the TRACE method and this method does not exemplify as any old helpful source, but rather as guidance for the writer and the reader. The TRACE method simply breaks down as T, R, A, C, E which eludes as the importance of the text, reader, author, constructive and not really sure what the E stands for. This method was created to organize paragraphs, distinguish the differences and similarities between the writer and the author, and to prompt the writer to define the eloquence and details within the article/book. Here now approaching the middle of the semester, the second paper was a difference from the previous analysis. For instance, if the writer supported the author, they were to do the opposite by exploring or bringing out the conducive parts in an argument. Comparing and contrasting was the expectation with the optional choice of using “he says, she says, I say, and they say” examples to prove the valid point of opinion.